Abstract

Marriage is the aspiration of almost everyone; it is not merely about finding happiness but is also viewed as worship and adherence to religious principles. In marriage, challenges inevitably arise, and if not managed well, they may lead to divorce. Therefore, readiness and maturity are essential for achieving marital satisfaction. Marital satisfaction represents the subjective evaluation of a couples or an individual's mental state and shared experiences with their partner. This study aims to examine the influence of forgiveness and religiousness on marital satisfaction among married couples in Purwokerto. The research utilizes a quantitative method with multiple regression analysis. Instruments employed include the marital satisfaction scale, forgiveness scale, and religiousness scale. The sample consists of 54 married couples in Purwokerto. Reliability testing using Cronbach's alpha yielded a result of 0.70. The findings of this study reveal a significant influence of forgiveness and religiousness on marital satisfaction among married couples in Purwokerto, as indicated by the calculated F-value of 33.521 and a probability value (p) of 0.000 (p0.05).

Keywords

  • Teaching
  • research
  • poetry

References

  1. Akhnaf, A. F., Vaca, A., Putri, R. P., & Sofia, N. (2024). Peran Pemaafan terhadap Kepuasan Pernikahan : A Literature. February. https://doi.org/10.36341/psi.v7i2.3448
  2. Amelia, R., Abidin, M. Z., & Windah, R. (2018). Hubungan antara Self Disclosure dan Religiusitas dengan Komitmen Pernikahan pada Istri Pelaut TNI-AL. 01(01), 53–54.
  3. Amrilah, T. K., & Widodo, P. B. (2015). Religiusitas Dan Pemaafan dalam Konflik Organisasi Pada Aktivis Islam Di Kampus Universitas Diponegoro. Jurnal Empati, 4(4), 287–292.
  4. https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/empati/article/view/14358/13889
  5. Azwar, S. (2019). Reliabilitas dan Validitas (4th ed.). pustaka pelajar.
  6. Chaplin, J. . (2006). Kamus Lengkap Psikologi. Raja Grafindo Persada.
  7. Enright, R. D. (2003). Forgiveness is a Choice : A Step-by-Step Process for Resolving Anger and Restoring Hope (1st ed.). American Psychological Association.
  8. Fetrus, O., & Soetjiningsih, C. H. (2020). The Relationship between Forgiveness and Marital Satisfaction of Wives Who Have Multiple Roles. Jurnal Jurusan Bimbingan Konseling Undiksha, 11(2), 119–126. https://doi.org/10.23887/jjbk.v11i2.30209
  9. Fowers, B. J., & Olson, D. H. (1993). ENRICH Marital Satisfaction Scale: A brief Research and Clinical Tool. Journal of Family Psychology, 7(2), 176–185.
  10. Habibi, U. R. (2015). Kepuasan Pernikahan Pada Wanita yang Dijodohkan. EJournal Psikologi, 3(2), 579–588.
  11. Harahap, S. R., & Lestari, Y. I. (2018). Peranan Komitmen Dan Komunikasi Interpersonal Dalam Meningkatkan Kepuasan Pernikahan pada Suami yang Memiliki Istri Bekerja. Jurnal Psikologi, 14(2), 120.
  12. https://doi.org/10.24014/jp.v14i2.5603
  13. Herawati, I., & Widiantoro, D. (2019). Kebersyukuran dan Kemaafan Terhadap Kepuasan Pernikahan. Al-Hikmah: Jurnal Agama Dan Ilmu Pengetahuan, 16(2), 108–119. https://doi.org/10.25299/jaip.2019.vol16(2).3782
  14. Huber, S., & Huber, O. W. (2012). The centrality of religiosity scale (CRS). Religions.
  15. Imannatul Istiqomah, & Mukhlis. (2015). Hubungan Antara Religiusitas dengan Kepuasan Perkawinan. Jurnal Psikologi UIN Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau, 11(Desember), 71–78.
  16. Iqbal, M. (2018). Psikologi Pernikahan. Gema Insani.
  17. Khairani, M., & Sari, D. P. (2019). Pemaafan Pada Individu yang Mengalami Perselingkuhan dalam Pernikahan. Fakultas Psikologi, 13(1), 35–43.
  18. Khasan, M. (2017). Perspektif Islam dan Psikologi Tentang Pemaafan. Jurnal At-Taqaddum, 9, 69–94.
  19. McCullough, M. E. (2000). Forgiveness as human strength: Theory, measurement, and links to well-being. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 19(1), 43–55. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2000.19.1.43
  20. McCullough, M. E., Root, L. M., & Cohen, A. D. (2006). Writing about the benefits of an interpersonal transgression facilitates forgiveness. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74(5), 887–897. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.74.5.887
  21. Niswati, I. (2014). Hubungan Loving, Kepuasan Seksual dan Religiusitas dengan Keharmonisan Perkawinan. Psibernetika, 4, 1–15.
  22. Raj, Paul., Elizabeth, & Padmakumari, P. (2016). Mental Health Trough Forgiveness: Exploring the Roots and Benefits. Cogent Psychology, 3, 1–16.
  23. Ramadhani, P. G., & Hermaleni, T. (2022). Hubungan Religiusitas Dengan Kepuasan Pernikahan Pada Pasutri Bersuku Minang. Jurnal Riset Psikologi.
  24. http://ejournal.unp.ac.id/students/index.php/psi/article/view/12749
  25. Rhoades, G. K., McIntosh, D. N., Wadsworth, M. E., Ahlkvist, J. A., Burwell, R. A., Gudmundsen, G. R., Raviv, T., & Rea, J. G. (2017). Forgiving the September 11th terrorists: Associations with coping, psychological distress, and religiosity. Anxiety, Stress and Coping, 20(2), 109–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615800701195405
  26. Rozalinda, R., & Nurhasanah, N. (2014). Persepsi Perempuan Tentang Perceraian Di Kota Padang. Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman, 38(2), 395–416.
  27. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30821/miqot.v38i2.69
  28. Sadarjoen, S. S. (2005). Konflik Marital : Pemahaman Konseptual, Aktual dan Alternatif Solusinya. Refika Aditama.
  29. Samsudin, T., & Anjarwati, S. (2021). The Strategy for Maintaining the Marriage Household with Long-Distance Relationship of State Civil Apparatus at the Regional Office of the Ministry of Religious Affairs of Gorontalo Province. Al-Bayyinah, 5(2), 172–185. https://doi.org/10.35673/al-bayyinah.v5i2.1784
  30. Srisusanti, S., & Zulkaida, A. (2013). Studi Deskriptif Mengenai Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Kepuasan Perkawinan pada Istri. UG Jurnal, 7(6), 8–12.
  31. Triningtyas, D. A., & Muhayati, S. (2017). Konseling Pranikah: Sebuah Upaya Meredukasi Budaya Pernikahan Dini di Kecamatan Pulung Kabupaten Ponorogo. JKI (Jurnal Konseling Indonesia), 3(1), 28–32.
  32. Wibiren, W. (2020). Kepuasan Perkawinan Ditinjau Dari Religiusitas Pada Pasangan Infertil Di Kelurahan Sei Sikambing D. Psikologi Prima, 3(1), 43–53. https://doi.org/10.34012/psychoprima.v3i1.1323