Abstract

This study aims at testing and analyzing the influence of perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, and attitude towards using on behavioral intention to use e money and moderated by compatibility. The population of this study is customers from a café in Jombang, Indonesia. Purposive sampling is the sampling technique used in this study, with the criteria Navila Café & Resto Jombang’s customers who directly visited during the study. This study uses physical questionnaire to collect data. The total number of respondents is 113 people. This study uses SEM-PLS as data analysis technique, while the analysis tool is Smart PLS 4. The finding of this study reveals, first, perceived ease of use gives positive significant influence towards perceived usefulness. Second, perceived ease of use gives positive significant influence towards attitude towards using. Third, perceived usefulness gives positive significant influence towards attitude towards using. Fourth, perceived usefulness has complementary mediation effect between perceived ease of use and attitude towards using. Fifth, attitude towards using gives positive significant influence towards behavioral intention to use. Sixth, compatibility doesn’t have moderation effect between attitude towards using and behavioral intention to use.  

Keywords

  • Diffusion Innovation Theory (DIT)
  • Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)
  • digital payment

References

  1. Ajzen, I. (2020). The theory of planned behavior: Frequently asked questions. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(4), 299-415.
  2. 1002/hbe2.195
  3. Al Hakim, R. R. (2022). Daily Behavior and Demographic Profile Affect Electricity Bill Increase During Covid-19 in Indonesia: SEM-PLS Approach. AKUA: Journal of Accounting and Finance, 1(1), 68-76. https://doi.org/10.54259/akua.v1i1.217
  4. Al-Rahmi, W. M., Yahaya, N., Aldraiweesh, A. A., Alamri, M. M., Aljarboa, N. A., Alturki, U., Aljeraiwi, A. A. (2019). Integrating Technology Acceptance Model With Innovation Diffusion Theory: An Empirical Investigation on Students' Intention to Use E-Learning Systems. IEEE Access, 7, 26797-26809.
  5. 1109/ACCESS.2019.2899368
  6. Aristio, A. P., Supardi, S., Hendrawan, R. A., Hidayat, A. A. (2019). Analysis on Purchase Intention of Indonesian Backpackers in Accommodation Booking through Online Travel Agent. Procedia Computer Science, 161,885-893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.11.196
  7. Assaker, A. (2019). Age and gender differences in online travel reviews and user generated-content (UGC) adoption: extending the technology acceptance model (TAM) with credibility theory. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 29(4),428-449. https://doi.org/10.1080/19368623.2019.1653807
  8. Astari, A. A. E., Yasa, N. N. K., Sukaatmadja, I. P. G., Giantari, I. G. A. K. (2022). Integration of technology acceptance model (TAM) and theory of planned behavior (TPB): An e-wallet behavior with fear of covid-19 as a moderating variable. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 6(4), 1427–1436.
  9. 5267/j.ijdns.2022.5.008
  10. Aulifin & Dewi (2022). Analisis Penerimaan Penggunaan ShopeePay Sebagai Sistem Pembayaran Elektronik Menggunakan Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) di Wilayah Kota Bogor. Jurnal Ilmiah MEA (Manajemen, Ekonomi, dan Akuntansi), 6 (1)
  11. Buabeng-Andoh, Charles & Baah, Charles (2020). Pre-service teachers' intention to use learning management system: an integration of UTAUT and TAM. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 17(4), 455-474. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-02-2020-0028
  12. Candy, Shellyna, Justyanita, Kristianti, N. (2022). E-wallet Adoption: Technology Acceptance Model and COVID-19. Journal of Economic Innovation, 7(1), 91- 100. https://doi.org/10.22219/jiko.v7i01.20385
  13. Chawla, D. & Joshi, H. (2019). Consumer attitudes and intention to adopt mobile wallets in India – An empirical study. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 37(7), 1590-1618. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-09-2018-0256
  14. Davis, F. (1989). User Acceptance of Information Systems: The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). University of Michigan, School of Business Administration, Division of Research. https://quod.lib.umich.edu/b/busadwp/images/b/1/4/b1409190.0001.001.pdf
  15. Elhajjar, S. & Ouaida, F. (2019). An analysis of factors influencing mobile banking adoption. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 38(2), 352-367. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-02-2019-0055
  16. Hadianti, S., Nurlela, S., Sungkar, H., Rifai, A., Dewi, R. K., Kurniawari, L. (2020). Analysis of Technology Acceptance Model of Ilmukomputer.Com Website Acceptance on Informatics Engineering Students. Journal of Information and Applied Technology (J-TIT), 7(1), 33-38
  17. Hair, J.F., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C.M. & Sarstedt, M. (2017) A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) 2nd Edition. Publisher Sage Publications Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA
  18. Haji, L., Valizadeh, N., Rezaei-Moghaddam, K., Hayati, D. (2020). Analyzing Iranian Farmers' Behavioral Intention towards Acceptance of Drip Irrigation Using Extended Technology Acceptance Model. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 22(5), 1177-1190.
  19. 1001.1.16807073.2020.22.5.15.9
  20. Hamid, M. R. Ab., Sami, W., Sidek, M. H. Mohmad (2017). Discriminant Validity Assessment: Use of Fornell & Larcker criterion versus HTMT Criterion. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 890, 1-5. DOI: 10.1088/1742- 6596/890/1/012163
  21. Han, J. H. & Sa, H. J. (2021). Acceptance of and satisfaction with online educational classes through the technology acceptance model (TAM): the COVID‐19 situation in Korea. Asia Pacific Education Review, 23, 403-415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-021-09716-7
  22. Harun, N. B., Jalil, H. A., Zolkepli, M. (2022). Technological, organizational and environmental factors influencing user intention towards big data technology adoption in Malaysian educational organizations. Accounting, 8, 403- 408. 10.5267/j.ac.2022.6.002
  23. Ho, J. C., Wu, C., Lee, C., Pham, T. (2020). Factors influencing the behavioral intention to adopt mobile banking: An international comparison. Technology in Society, 63, 101360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101360
  24. Idrus, S. A., Abdussakir, & Djakfar, M. (2020). The effect of entrepreneurial orientation and technology orientation on market orientation with education as moderating variable. Management Science Letters, 10(10), 164-174
  25. Irawati, A. E., Suhartono, E. (2020). Analysis of Technology Acceptance Model of LinkAja Application. Journal of Economic and Business Research, 13(3), 2351-2360. 10.5267/j.msl.2020.2.030
  26. Isrososiawan, S., Hurriyati, R., Dirgantari, P. D. (2019). Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) toward "Dana" E-Wallet Customer. Minds Journal: Management, Ideas, Inspiration, 6(2), 181-192.
  27. 24252/minds.v6i2.11274
  28. Jiang, Y., Wang, X., Yuen, K. F. (2021). Augmented reality shopping application usage: The influence of attitude, values, and characteristics of innovation. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 63, 102720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102720
  29. Kamal, S. A., Shafiq, M., Kakria, P. (2020). Investigating acceptance of telemedicine services through an extended technology acceptance model (TAM). Technology in Society, 60. 101212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.101212
  30. Khiong, K., Arijanto, R., Mulyandi, M. R., Putra, R. S., Siagian, A. O., Wijoyo, H., Purwanto, A., Fahmi, K. (2022). The Role of Compatibility, Perceived Usefulness, Convenience Perception and Convenience Perception on Electronic Money (e-Wallet) Usage Interest. Journal of Positive School Psychology. 6(5), 6281-6286
  31. Kim, T., Suh, Y. K., Lee, G., & Choi, B. G. (2010). Modeling Roles of Task- technology Fit and Self-efficiency in Hotel Employees Usage Behaviors of Hotel Information Systems. International Journal of Tourism Research. 12, 709-725. 10.1002/jtr.787
  32. Kota, T. P., Kusumastuti, S. Y. (2020). Analysis of the Influence of Customer Interest in Using Mobile Banking Using the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) Framework. e-Journal of Economic Appreciation, 10(3), 276-288
  33. Kustini, Izaak, W. C., Rini, H. P. (2020). The Influence of Readiness to Change and Proactive Behavior on Performance. Bisma: Journal of Business and Management, 14(3), 180-190. 10.5267/j.ac.2022.6.002
  34. Marivan, S. A., Kurniawati, Masnita, Y. (2022). The Credibility of Social Media Influencer Marketing on Purchase Interest: Hedonism as Moderation. Scientific Journal of Management and Business, 23(2), 130-145. http://dx.doi.org/10.30596/jimb.v23i2.11304
  35. Min, S., So, K. K. F, Jeong, M. (2018). Consumer adoption of the Uber mobile application: Insights from diffusion of innovation theory and technology acceptance model. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 36(7), 770-783. 10.1080/10548408.2018.1507866
  36. Musyaffi, A. M. & Kayati (2019). Impact of Convenience and Risk of QR Code Payment System: Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) Extension. Journal of Business and Management Inspiration, 3(2), 161-176. http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/jitp.v6i2.26232
  37. Na, S.; Heo, S.; Han, S.; Shin, Y.; Roh, Y (2022). Acceptance Model of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Based Technologies in Construction Firms: Applying the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) in Combination with the Technology–Organization–Environment (TOE) Framework. Buildings 2022, 12, 90. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12020090
  38. Pramudya, R. B. & Firmialy, S. D. (2022). The Influence of Customer Satisfaction on Brand Loyalty in Coffee Shops: A Comparative Study of Generation Z Individuals Exhibiting High Vs Low Financial Literacy. SEIKO : Journal of Management & Business, 4(3), 589-597. DOI: 10.37531/sejaman.v4i3.346
  39. Purwanto, A. & Wulanningtyas, M. E. (2022). Structural Analysis of Equation Model in the Study of Factors Affecting Students' Mathematics Learning Outcomes. IKA Journal: UNARS PGSD Alumni Association, 12(2), 237-246.
  40. https://doi.org/10.36841/pgsdunars.v10i2
  41. Rahmawati, R. N. & Narsa, I. M. (2019). Intention to Use e-Learning: Application of Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Research & Accounting Journal, 3(2), 260-269. https://doi.org/10.33395/owner.v3i2.151
  42. Sholihin, M. & Ratmono, D. (2020). Analisis SEM-PLS dengan WarPLS 7.0 untuk Hubungan Nonlinier dalam Penelitian Sosial dan Bisnis. Penerbit ANDI
  43. Singh, N., Sinha, N. (2019). How perceived trust mediates merchant's intention to use a mobile wallet technology. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 52, 11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.101894
  44. Singh, S. & Srivastava, P. (2019). Social media for outbound leisure travel: a framework based on technology acceptance model (TAM). Journal of Tourism Futures, 5(1), 43-61. 10.1108/JTF-10-2018-0058
  45. Singh, S., Sahni, M. M., Kovid, R. K. (2020). What drives FinTech adoption? A multi-method evaluation using an adapted technology acceptance model. Management Decision, 58(8), 1675-1697.
  46. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-09-2019- 1318
  47. Tsai, Y. & Tiwasing, P. (2021). Customers' intention to adopt smart lockers in last-mile delivery service: A multi-theory perspective. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 61,102514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102514
  48. Widodo, T., Putri, S. F. (2021). Analysis of Interest in Using LinkAja Digital Wallet with Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) Approach in Bandung. Journal of Management and Organization (JMO), 12(2), 134-145
  49. Yang, M., Al-Mamun, A., Mohiuddin, M., Nawi, N. C., Zainol, N. R. (2021). Cashless Transactions: A Study on Intention and Adoption of e-Wallets. Sustainability 2021, 13, 831. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020831
  50. Yuriev, A., Dahmen, M., Paillé, P., Boiral, O., Guillaumie, L. (2020). Pro-environmental behaviors through the lens of the theory of planned behavior: A scoping review. Resources, Conservation and Recycling,155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104660
  51. Zabukovšek, S. S., Bobek, S., Zabukovšek, U., Kalini ́c, Z., Tominc, P. (2022). Enhancing PLS-SEM-Enabled Research with ANN and IPMA: Research Study of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Systems' Acceptance Based on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Mathematics, 10(9), 1379.
  52. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10091379