Abstract

Women hold less than 2 % of seafaring roles worldwide and an even smaller share in Tanzania, largely because access to technical training remains gender skewed. Guided by Social Learning and Transformational Leadership theories, this mixed methods study assesses how mentor supported skills development initiatives influence women’s career resilience at the WOMESA hub in Dar es Salaam. Survey data from 65 female maritime professionals and 18 in depth interviews were analysed with SPSS v28 and NVivo 14. Skills development correlated strongly with resilience (r = .71, p < .01) and retained a significant independent effect in a hierarchical regression (β = .31), even after networking and psychosocial support were controlled, lifting explained variance to 67 %. Qualitative themes “tool kit empowerment,” “certification acceleration,” and “confidence transference” revealed that short courses, mentor brokered sponsorships, and crisis- shadowing collectively boost self-efficacy. However, resource bottlenecks (“male-first” sponsorship norms, limited simulator slots) temper these gains. The findings show that equitably funded, mentor guided training is catalytic for women’s adaptability and advancement, offering actionable guidance for maritime policy makers and organizations aiming to build an inclusive, resilient Blue Economy workforce.

Keywords

  • Career Resilience
  • Skills Development
  • Mentorship
  • Women in Maritime
  • Tanzania

References

  1. Baker, L., Hammond, R., & Ndume, I. (2023). “You don’t look like an engineer”: Gendered perceptions of technical competence in East African shipping. Journal of Maritime Social Studies, 42(1), 57–75.
  2. Bandura, A. (2013). Social cognitive theory of learning. In A. J. Elliot (Ed.), Handbook of motivation and cognition (pp. 99–120). Guilford Press.
  3. Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2014). Transformational leadership (3rd ed.). Routledge. Cohen, J. (2013). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Routledge.
  4. Collins, B., & Stockton, D. (2018). Resilience at work: A review and methodological critique. International Journal of Management Reviews, 20(2), 269–286. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12118
  5. Connor, K. M., & Davidson, J. R. T. (2003). Development of a new resilience scale: The Connor– Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). Depression and Anxiety, 18(2), 76–82. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.10113
  6. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE.
  7. Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics (5th ed.). SAGE.
  8. Goldenhar, L. M., Shen, Y., & Hecker, S. (2021). Peer mentoring as a strategy to improve safety climate and reduce injuries among women in construction trades. Safety Science, 140, Article 105307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105307
  9. Guest, G., Namey, E., & Sunley, E. (2020). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 32(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X19868939
  10. International Maritime Organization. (2023). Women in maritime: An IMO gender programme report 2023. https://www.imo.org/gender
  11. International Maritime Rescue Federation. (2025). #WomenInSAR mentoring initiative: Impact report 2025. https://international-maritime-rescue.org
  12. Khalid, R., & Shanks, G. (2020). Human-capital pathways to resilience in knowledge work: A systematic review. Journal of Knowledge Management, 24(5), 939–964.
  13. Kitada, M., & Ölçer, A. İ. (2020). Sponsorship and gendered opportunity structures among women seafarers. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 19, 395–412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437- 020-00210-3
  14. Lengnick-Hall, C. A., Beck, T. E., & Lengnick-Hall, M. L. (2011). Developing a capacity for organizational resilience through strategic human resource management. Human Resource Management Review, 21(3), 243–255.
  15. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (2013). Establishing trustworthiness. In J. A. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide (pp. 324–350). SAGE.
  16. Lopez, M., & Rivera, J. (2021). Mentorship clinics and licensure-exam anxiety among Filipino deck cadets: A longitudinal study. Maritime Education Review, 7(2), 22–37.
  17. Maganga, P., & Simon, N. (2023). Gendered access to maritime training sponsorships in Tanzania: An audit of institutional practices. African Maritime Policy Review, 5(1), 11–28.
  18. Mlambo, S. (2017). Validating a skills-development scale for maritime professionals. South African Journal of Industrial Psychology, 43, Article a1442.
  19. Mussa, R., & Salum, H. (2019). Perceptions of maritime careers among Tanzanian secondary- school girls. Journal of African Maritime Studies, 10(2), 85–102.
  20. Mwasala, E. (2022). Female participation patterns in Tanzania’s port operations: A decade review.
  21. Tanzania Journal of Shipping & Logistics, 14(1), 1–19.
  22. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
  23. Pham, T. T., & Loke, Y. W. (2021). Unequal berths: Gender disparities in bridge-resource- management training across ASEAN maritime academies. Maritime Technology & Research, 3(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.33175/mtr.2021.235
  24. Safety4Sea. (2024, April 7). Empowering women in maritime: Why mentoring is the missing link. https://safety4sea.com
  25. Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2019). Research methods for business students (8th ed.).
  26. Pearson.
  27. Smith, J., & Ndume, S. (2019). Skill-pipeline challenges facing women deck officers in East Africa. Maritime HR Quarterly, 6(4), 33–47.
  28. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. (2021). Review of Maritime Transport 2021: Women, shipping and development. UNCTAD.
  29. van Vuuren, A., & Schlechter, A. (2021). Meta-analytic evidence for the effectiveness of mentorship in STEM professions. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 32(3), 333– 362.
  30. Yang, Y., Keller, J., & Burt, R. S. (2019). Women’s leadership success and the structure of social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(2), 594–599.
  31. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1802953