Abstract

Indonesia’s maritime domain faces increasingly complex security threats, particularly amid the evolving dynamics of the Indo-Pacific region marked by the rise of illegal, unreported, and unregulated (IUU) fishing, smuggling, and jurisdictional violations. These challenges are compounded by institutional fragmentation in maritime law enforcement, where overlapping mandates among multiple agencies have resulted in weak coordination, task duplication, and a fragile Maritime Domain Awareness (MDA) framework. This study analyzes the policy transformation needs of the Indonesian Maritime Security Agency (Bakamla) toward adopting a sea and coast guard model as a strategic approach to strengthen national maritime security governance. Using a qualitative document analysis, the study examines key legal instruments namely Law No. 32/2014, Law No. 17/2008, and Government Regulation No. 13/2022 that serve as Bakamla’s operational foundations. A comparative analysis of maritime security practices in the United States, Japan, South Korea, and Singapore is also conducted to identify relevant lessons. Findings indicate that Bakamla already possesses a strategic mandate for coordination, patrol, and information integration; however, implementation remains constrained by limited interagency integration, inadequate resources, and institutional resistance. The study concludes that transforming Bakamla into a single-agency, multi-task institution is essential to address authority fragmentation and enhance maritime law enforcement effectiveness. Institutional reform can be achieved through regulatory consolidation, establishment of a unified command, development of an Integrated Maritime Information Center (IMIC), and clarification of roles at strategic, operational, and tactical levels. Implementing the sea and coast guard model is expected to enhance cross-sectoral integration and strengthen Indonesia’s capacity to respond to contemporary maritime threats.

Keywords

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Human-in-the-loop
  • AI-assisted Shortcutting
  • Generative AIs
  • AI dependency
  • AI Literacy

References

  1. Afriansyah, A., Imanuel, C., & Darmawan, A. R. (2024). Nurturing Hero or Villain: BAKAMLA as the Indonesian Coast Guard. Politics and Governance, 12(7806),1–14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.7806
  2. ARIF, M., AFRIANSYAH, A., CHAIRIL, T., & LESTARI, G. A. (2024). Grey Zone Conflict in the South China Sea. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 46(3), 407–434. https://doi.org/https://www.jstor.org/stable/27352210
  3. Aritonang, F. N. T., Arkady, J. C., Torindatu, L. A. R., & Silalahi, V. A. J. M. (2025). Indonesia’s Position as a Maritime Axis in the Global Logistics Chain. JIPOWER : Journal of Intellectual Power, 2(1),110–123. https://doi.org/10.63786/jipower.v2i1.38
  4. Aswani, R. S. (2022). Non-Traditional maritime security threats in the Indian Ocean Region: Policy alternatives. Journal of Public Affairs, 22(2), e2456. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2456
  5. Bueger, C. (2017). Effective Maritime Domain Awareness in the Western Indian Ocean. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.10288.46089
  6. Bulandari, D. (2025). Comparison of Coast Guard Institutions in Four Countries: Analysis of Good Practices for the Indonesian Coast Guard (In Indonesian). Jurnal Politica Dinamika Masalah Politik Dalam Negeri Dan Hubungan Internasional, 16(1), 39–56. https://doi.org/10.22212/jp.v16i1.5106
  7. Chapsos, I., & Hamilton, S. (2019). Illegal fishing and fisheries crime as a transnational organized crime in Indonesia. Trends in Organized Crime, 22(3), 255–273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12117-018-9329-8
  8. Dirhamsyah, D., Umam, S., & Arifin, Z. (2022). Maritime law enforcement: Indonesia’s experience against illegal fishing. Ocean & Coastal Management, 229,106304. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2022.106304
  9. Fita, G. A. (2025). Enhancing Maritime Security through Strategic Intelligence: The Relevance of the Global Maritime Axis to Indonesia’s National Resilience. Security Intelligence Terrorism Journal (SITJ), 2(1 SE-Articles), 118–128. https://doi.org/10.70710/sitj.v2i1.40
  10. KOTANI, T. (2015). Japan’s Maritime Security Strategy: The Japan Coast Guard and Maritime Outlaws. Social Science Japan Journal, 18(2), 241–244. https://doi.org/10.1093/ssjj/jyv026
  11. Kurniaty, R., Suryokumoro, H., & Widagdo, S. (2021). The Role of Marine Security Agency (BAKAMLA) As Indonesia Coast Guard in Indonesian Water Jurisdiction. Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 15(3), 221–232. https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v15no3.2017
  12. LAKSMANA, E. A. (2022). Remodelling Indonesia’s Maritime Law Enforcement Architecture. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 44(1), 122–149.
  13. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27130810
  14. Magalhães, M. E. de, Barbosa, C. E., Cordeiro, K. D., Isidorio, D. K., & Souza, J. M. (2023). Improving Maritime Domain Awareness in Brazil through Computer Vision Technology. In Journal of Marine Science and Engineering (Vol. 11, Issue 7). https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse11071272
  15. Marliani, M. (2024). Enhancing Maritime Security : Challenges and Strategies in Indonesia ’ s Natuna Sea. Journal of Maritime Policy Science, 1(1), 32–39. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31629/jmps.v1i1.6876
  16. Okafor-Yarwood, I., Eastwood, O., Chikowore, N., & de Oliveira Paes, L. (2024). Technology and maritime security in Africa: Opportunities and challenges in Gulf of Guinea. Marine Policy, 160, 105976. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2023.105976
  17. Pajon, C. (2017). Japan’s Coast Guard and Maritime Self-Defense Force in the East China Sea: Can a Black-and-White System Adapt to a Gray-Zone Reality? Asia Policy, 23, 111–130.
  18. https://doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/asp.2017.0016.
  19. Pandey, S. K. (2023). A Comprehensive Classification System of Non- traditional Maritime Security Threats : a step towards. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 13(6), 227–234. https://doi.org/10.29322/IJSRP.13.06.2023.p13831
  20. Perera, P. M. (2021). Maritime Technology and Research Integrated maritime picture for effective domain awareness. Maritime Technology and Research, 2(3), 108–113.
  21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33175/mtr.2021.224463
  22. Prissandi, G., Surya Wiranto, Budiman Djoko Said, Pujo Widodo, Herlina Juni Risma Saragih, & Panji Suwarno. (2023). Reformulation of Regulations in the Context of Structuring the Indonesian Maritime Security Regime. International Journal Of Humanities Education and Social Sciences, 2(6 SE-Social Science). https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v2i6.533
  23. Rahayu, L., Busscher, T., Tillema, T., & Woltjer, J. (2024). Maritime transport governance challenges in the Global South. Marine Policy, 163, 106147. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2024.106147
  24. Sartika Saimima, I. D., Clara Ignatia Tobing, & Mochammad Syafruddin Rezky Sanaky. (2022). Human Trafficking on Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated Fishing Cases as Transnational Crime on Indonesia Coastal Boundary. Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 2(2 SE-Articles),51–65. https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v2i2.74
  25. Sosnowski, M., Petrossian, G., Nunphong, T., & Piza, E. (2024). Crimes at sea: Exploring the nexus of maritime crimes across global EEZs. Marine Policy, 166, 106161. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2024.106161
  26. Twrdy, E., Androjna, A., & Pavliha, M. (2014). Proposed Model of Coast Guard Enhancing Maritime Security and Safety in the Republic of Slovenia. Promet-Traffic & Transportation, 26, 497–506. https://doi.org/10.7307/ptt.v26i6.1491
  27. Zhang, S. (2025). Law enforcement or use of force: The legal nature of activities conducted by CCG and JCG in the disputed waters. Marine Policy, 171, 106440. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2024.106440