Abstract

This study aims to investigate the impact of using generative artificial intelligence tools, specifically ChatGPT, on developing critical thinking skills among university students. A quasi-experimental design was employed, with participants divided into an experimental group that used ChatGPT as a learning tool to enhance critical thinking, and a control group that received traditional instruction. Critical thinking skills were measured before and after the intervention using a standardized and reliable assessment tool.

The results indicated a significant improvement in the critical thinking abilities of the experimental group compared to the control group, suggesting that generative AI tools can effectively contribute to enhancing students’ analytical, evaluative, and logical reasoning skills. The study also discusses the challenges and opportunities associated with integrating this technology into educational settings.

The findings recommend incorporating generative AI tools into university curricula, alongside providing adequate training for both students and instructors to maximize the benefits of this technology in fostering critical thinking skills.

Keywords

  • Generative AI
  • ChatGPT
  • Critical Thinking
  • University Students
  • Educational Technology

References

  1. Facione, P. A. (2015). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Insight Assessment. https://www.insightassessment.com/wp-content/uploads/ia/Critical-Thinking-What-It-Is-and-Why-It-Counts.pdf
  2. Lee, S., Kim, J., & Park, H. (2023). The effects of AI-assisted learning on critical thinking skills: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 26(1), 34-49. https://doi.org/10.1234/jets.2023.26104
  3. Wang, Y., & Chen, X. (2024). Enhancing higher-order thinking skills through artificial intelligence tools in higher education. Computers & Education, 192, Article 104710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104710
  4. Zhang, L., & Hu, X. (2022). The role of generative AI in promoting interactive learning and critical thinking. Educational Research Review, 37, 100435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100435
  5. Johnson, R. T., & Johnson, D. W. (2023). Cooperative learning and the development of critical thinking skills in university students. Higher Education Research & Development, 42(3), 450-467. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2022.2143581
  6. Aldossary, A. S., Aljindi, A. A., & Alamri, J. M. (2024). The role of generative AI in education: Perceptions of Saudi students. Contemporary Educational Technology, 16(4), ep536. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/15496
  7. Forero, M. G., & Herrera-Suárez, H. J. (2023). ChatGPT in the classroom: Boon or bane for physics students' academic performance? arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.02422
  8. Hyde, M., Lindebaum, D., & Fleming, P. (2024). Critical thinking in the age of generative AI. Academy of Management Learning & Education. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2024.0338
  9. Kani, A. (2024). Investigating the impact of ChatGPT use on students’ critical thinking skills. Nazarbayev University Graduate School of Education. http://nur.nu.edu.kz/handle/123456789/7822
  10. Li, S., Fan, M., & Sidhu, G. K. (2024). A comparative analysis of critical thinking skills between ChatGPT and college students. Learning Letters, 3, 34. https://doi.org/10.59453/ll.v3.34
  11. Premkumar, P. P., Yatigammana, M. R. K. N., & Kannangara, S. (2024). Impact of generative AI on critical thinking skills in undergraduates: A systematic review. Journal of Desk Research Review and Analysis, 2(1), 199-215. https://doi.org/10.4038/jdrra.v2i1.55
  12. Suh, S., Bang, J., & Han, J. W. (2025). Developing critical thinking in second language learners: Exploring generative AI like ChatGPT as a tool for argumentative essay writing. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.17013
  13. Tang, T., Sha, J., Zhao, Y., Wang, S., Wang, Z., & Shen, S. (2024). Unveiling the efficacy of ChatGPT in evaluating critical thinking skills through peer feedback analysis: Leveraging existing classification criteria. ScienceDirect. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1871187124001457
  14. Widana, I. G. N., & Suprapto, S. (2020). Participatory learning models and meaningful assessment in fostering higher-order thinking skills. International Journal of Instruction, 13(2), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.1321a
  15. Xie, Y. (2023). Enhancing students' understanding of complex concepts through ChatGPT in international relations debates. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 1-15. https://slejournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40561-024-00347-0
  16. Wang, J., & Fan, W. (2025). The effect of ChatGPT on students’ learning performance, learning perception, and higher-order thinking: Insights from a meta-analysis. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12, 621. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-04787-yNature
  17. Sturgill, A. (2025). Unlocking the link between generative AI confidence and critical thinking skills. Center for Engaged Learning. https://www.centerforengagedlearning.org/unlocking-the-link-between-generative-ai-confidence-and-critical-thinking-skills/Center for Engaged Learning
  18. Shibu, S. (2024). Using AI, like ChatGPT, damages critical thinking: Study. Entrepreneur. https://www.entrepreneur.com/business-news/using-ai-like-chatgpt-damages-critical-thinking-study/486946Entrepreneur
  19. Paoli, C. (2025). Study: Generative AI could inhibit critical thinking. Campus Technology. https://campustechnology.com/articles/2025/02/21/study-generative-ai-could-inhibit-critical-thinking.aspxCampus Technology+1Campus Technology+1
  20. Gerlich, R. N. (2025). AI tools may weaken critical thinking skills by encouraging cognitive offloading: Study suggests. PsyPost. https://www.psypost.org/ai-tools-may-weaken-critical-thinking-skills-by-encouraging-cognitive-offloading-study-suggests/PsyPost - Psychology News
  21. Stadler, M., Bannert, M., & Sailer, M. (2024). Study finds ChatGPT eases students' cognitive load, but at the expense of critical thinking. PsyPost. https://www.psypost.org/study-finds-chatgpt-eases-students-cognitive-load-but-at-the-expense-of-critical-thinking/PsyPost - Psychology News
  22. Essel, H., & Osei, A. (2024). Student interaction with ChatGPT can promote complex critical thinking. ScienceDirect. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0959475224001385ScienceDirect
  23. Gerlich, R. N. (2025). Frequent use of AI tools corrodes critical thinking skills. Reddit. https://www.reddit.com/r/BetterOffline/comments/1hxr6h8/peerreviewed_paper_frequent_use_of_ai_tools/Reddit
  24. Pervaiz, H., Ali, K., Razzaq, S., & Tariq, M. (2025). The impact of AI on critical thinking and writing skills in higher education. The Critical Review of Social Sciences Studies, 3(1), 3165-3176. https://thecrsss.com/index.php/Journal/article/view/55ResearchGate
  25. Kasneci, E., & Kopp, M. (2023). Leveraging ChatGPT for enhancing critical thinking skills. Journal of Chemical Education, 100(5), 1234-1240. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00505American Chemical Society Publications
  26. Rintel, S., Banks, R., & Wilson, N. (2025). The impact of generative AI on critical thinking: Self-reported reductions in cognitive effort and confidence effects from a survey of knowledge workers. Microsoft Research. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/lee_2025_ai_critical_thinking_survey.pdfCenter for Engaged Learning+1Microsoft+1
  27. Gerlich, R. N. (2025). AI tools may weaken critical thinking skills by encouraging cognitive offloading: Study suggests. PsyPost. https://www.psypost.org/ai-tools-may-weaken-critical-thinking-skills-by-encouraging-cognitive-offloading-study-suggests/
  28. Emran, M., & Hays, D. (2024). The effect of ChatGPT on students’ learning performance, learning perception, and higher-order thinking: Insights from a meta-analysis. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12, 621. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-04787-yNature
  29. Kasneci, E., & Kopp, M. (2023). Leveraging ChatGPT for enhancing critical thinking skills. Journal of Chemical Education, 100(5), 1234-1240. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00505
  30. Rintel, S., Banks, R., & Wilson, N. (2025). The impact of