Abstract

Metacognitive knowledge is crucial for efficient independent learning because it fosters forethought and self-reflection. This study investigated the metacognitive awareness of the 90 education freshman students at Iloilo State University of Fisheries Science and Technology Main Campus Tiwi Site for Academic Year 2023-2024, Iloilo, Philippines. The analysis was undertaken using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences and  descriptive and inferential statistics such as Mean, Standard Deviation, Frequency and Percentage, t-test, One-Wat ANOVA were used in the analysis at .05 significant level. Results revealed that students possess a very high level of implicit knowledge and knowledge related to methods, procedures or operation of equipment. However, they only demonstrate a moderate verbal or factual knowledge. In terms of regulation of cognition, students had extreme level of knowledge in the area of planning, comprehension monitoring, debugging strategies, and Evaluation. However, they demonstrate moderate level of awareness on information management strategies. In terms of regulation of cognition, student expressed an extreme level of skills in goal setting, and allocating resources prior to learning, assessing their own learning or strategy, and using appropriate strategies to correct comprehension and performance errors. But, they perceived some areas of improvement such as their ability and strategy sequences used to process information more efficiently such as organizing, elaborating, summarizing, and selective focusing. In terms of profile, gender orientation does not define what students know about themselves, strategies, and conditions under which strategies are most useful; and their knowledge about the way they plan, implement strategies, monitor, correct comprehension errors, and evaluate their learning. An instructional material must be developed for classroom used in areas such as Science, Physical Education, English, Mathematics, Filipino, and Social Science using metacognitive strategies through metacognitive questions to improve students’ metacognitive ability in process new information by planning and evaluating.

Keywords

  • Organizational commitment
  • non-public university lecturers
  • PLS-SEM

References

  1. Academic Support Center, Rowan College of South Jersey. Metacognitive Awareness Inventory. Downloaded from
  2. file:///C:/Users/asus/Desktop/PD%201203/ Metacognitive%20Awareness%20Inventory.pdf
  3. Biscocho, S.S. (2021). Metacognitive knowledge, skills and attitude of science technology and society students across programs. Vol. 15, No. 1 (2021), Luz Y Saber. ISSN 2244-6338 (Online), ISSN 1908 9147 (Print). https://ejournals.ph/article.php?id=17163
  4. Boakye, N. A. and N. A. (2017). Extensive reading in a tertiary reading programme: Students’ accounts of affective and cognitive benefits, Read. Writ., vol. 8, no. 1, p. 9 pages, 2017.
  5. Constantino, J. A., Sison, M. H., and De Guzman, P. S. (2020). Metacognitive Awareness and General Average Grade of 2nd Year BEED and BSE Students of NEUST-SIC. https://ijels.com/detail/metacognitive-awareness-and-general-average-grade-of-2nd-year-beed-and-bse-students-of-neust-sic/
  6. Craig, K., Hale, D., Grainger, C., and Stewart, M. E. (2020). Evaluating metacognitive self-reports: systematic reviews of the value of self-report in metacognitive research. Metacogn. Learn. 15, 155–213. DOI: 10.1007/s11409-020-09222-y
  7. Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: a new area of cognitive developmental inquiry. American Psychologist 34, pp. 906-911.
  8. Greene, J.A. (2021). Teacher support for metacognition and self-regulated learning: a compelling story and a prototypical model. Metacognition Learning, 16, 651–666.
  9. Hassel, S., Ridout, N. (2018). An investigation of first-year students' and lecturers' expectations of university education. Frontiers in Psychology, 8.
  10. Jaleel, S. and Premachandran. P (2016). A study on the metacognitive awareness of secondary school students. Universal Journal of Educational Research 4(1): 165-172, 2016. DOI: 10.13189/ujer.2016.040121. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1086242.pdf
  11. Retno Wulan and Jannatul Laily Noviabahari (2018). The freshmen’s metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 222. file:///C:/Users/asus/Downloads/25903345.pdf
  12. Ribeiro, L., Rosário, P., Núñez, J.C., Gaeta, M., Fuentes, S. (2019). First-year students’ background and academic achievement: the mediating role of student engagement. Frontiers in Psychology, 10
  13. Schunk, D. (2019). Learning Theories: An Educational Perspective 8th Edition. Pearson. https://eng1020jankensfall2012.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/2_schrunk_metacognition.pdf
  14. Sarıcoban, A. (2015). Metacognitive Awareness of pre-service English Language Teachers in Terms of Various Variables. 5th World Conference on Learning, Teaching and Educational Leadership, WCLTA 2014. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 186 ( 2015 ) 664 – 669. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.135
  15. Sato, M. (2020). Metacognitive instruction for collaborating interaction: the process and product of self-regulated learning in the Chilean EFL context. In C. Lambert & R. Oliver (Eds.), Using tasks in second language teaching: Practice in diverse contexts. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters, 215-236.
  16. Training Industry (2024a). Declarative Knowledge. https://trainingindustry.com/glossary/declarative-knowledge/#:~:text=Declarative%20knowledge%20refers%20to%20facts,their%20relation%20to%20each%20other.
  17. Training Industry (2024b). Procedural Knowledge. https://trainingindustry.com/glossary/procedural-knowledge/
  18. Werdiningsih, D., Al-Rashidi, A. H., and Azami, M. I (2022). The development of metacognitive models to support students' autonomous learning: lessons from Indonesian primary schools", Education Research International, vol. 2022, Article ID 6102282, 12 pages, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6102282
  19. Ovan, Waluya, S. B., & Nugroho, S. E. (2018). Analysis mathematical literacy skills in terms of the students’ metacognition on PISA-CPS model. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 983(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/983/1/012151
  20. Ozturk, N. (2017). Assessing metacognition: theory and practices. Int. J. Assess. Tool. Educ. 4, 134–148. doi: 10.21449/ijate.298299