Abstract

Context: The adoption of innovative agricultural practices is promoted as a way to improve the living conditions of rural communities. Objective: This study assesses the contribution and understanding of agroecological practices on market garden farms in the Solomougou irrigated area in the Korhogo department. Methods: A quantitative approach was implemented on a sample of 203 female producers surveyed in 10 villages, and a qualitative approach through three focus groups was used to understand the perceptions of users of the area. A binary logistic regression was used to identify the determinants of the adoption of agroecological practices.

 

Results: The female producers, mostly aged 31 to 50, have a low level of education (75.37%), and 79.31% have more than 10 years of experience. Yields are higher for farms undergoing ecological transition (4.41 T/ha) than those using conventional practices (3.8 T/ha) for the combined production of eggplant, pepper and okra. The adoption of agroecological practices is significantly influenced by the size of the workforce, the level of education, and the farming system used. While some recognize its environmental benefits and its propensity for resilience, concerns remain regarding the often unpredictable yields and increased workload.

 

Conclusion: Ultimately, the irrigated area brings greater productivity to female producers undergoing agroecological transition. While the exploitation of this new production environment has strengthened women's empowerment, it has also increased their social responsibilities through increased workload, thus hindering their overall emancipation.

 

Keywords

  • Agroecology
  • Market gardening
  • Irrigation
  • Adoption
  • Perception
  • Korhogo
  • Ivory Coast

References

  1. Akchaya K., Parasuraman P., Pandian K., Vijayakumar S., Thirukumaran K., Mustaffa M. R. A. F., Rajpoot S. K.  Choudhary A. K. (2025). Améliorer l’efficacité de l’utilisation des ressources, la fertilité des sols, la sécurité alimentaire, les services écosystémiques et la résilience climatique grâce à la culture intercalaire de légumineuses : une revue. Front. Sustain. Food Syst., http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2025.1527256
  2. Altieri A. M.  Nicholls C. I. (2005). Agroecology and the Search for a Truly Sustainable Agriculture, 1st edition. United Nations Environment Programme, 291 pages. http://www.agroeco.org/doc/agroecology-engl-PNUMA.pdf
  3. ARAA (2025). Étude de capitalisation transversale du Programme Agro écologie en Afrique de l'Ouest (PAE). Rapports thématiques, 111 p. [2025] Etude de capitalisation transversale du PAE - Rapports thématiques FR.pdf
  4. Ballé S. G. R, Ahoure A. A & Ouattara A. (2018). Socio economic characterization and sustainability of artisanal fishing in Grand-Lahou lagoon (Côte d’Ivoire). The Social Sciences, 13 (11) : 1516-1526. Socio Economic Characterization and Sustainability of Artisanal Fishing in Grand Lahou Lagoon (Cote d’Ivoire)
  5. Ballé S. G. R. (2019). Dynamique de la pêche artisanale en lagune de grand-Lahou (Côte d’Ivoire) : Effort de pêche, aspects socio-économiques et durabilité, « Thèse » en Sciences et Gestion de l’Environnement, Université Nangui Abrogoua (Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire), 191pages.
  6. Ghali M., Jaballah, M. B., Arfa N. B.  Sigwalt A. (2022). Analysis of factors that influence adoption of agroecological practices in viticulture. Review of Agricultural, Food and Environment Studies, 103 :179-209
  7. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s41130-022-00171-5.pdf
  8. Carr E. R.  Thompson M. C. (2014). Gender and climate change adaptation in agrarian settings: Current thinking, new directions, and research frontiers. Geography Compass, 8(3): 182–197.
  9. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12121
  10. Chalico T. A.  Riegelhaupt E. M. (2002). Guide pour les enquêtes sur la demande, l'offre et l'approvisionnement en combustibles ligneux: Programme de partenariat Commission Européenne FAO (2000-2002). FAO, Rome, 80 pages.
  11. https://www.fao.org/DOCREP/005/Y3779E/Y3779E00.HTM
  12. Coulibaly A., motelica H. M.  Hien E. (2019). Determinants of Agroecological Practices Adoption in the Sudano-Sahelian Zone. Journal of Environmental Protection, 2019, 10, 900-918. https://doi.org/10.4236/jep.2019.107053
  13. D'Souza G.  Ikerd J. (2015). Small farms and sustainable development: Is small more sustainable? Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 28(1):73-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1074070800009470
  14. Darnhofer I., Schneeberger J.  Penker P. (2010). Exploring the diversity of farmers' adaptation strategies to climate change: an analytical framework and an application to Austrian organic farmers. Agricultural Systems, 103 (2) : 82-91.
  15. https://doi.org/10.1051/agro/2009053
  16. Dhehibi S. (2017). Droits de propriété et adoption de l'agro écologie dans la zone cotonnière du Bénin : étude de cas de la commune de Kandi. Mémoire Master 2, CIHEAM Montpellier, 81 pages. Droits de propriété et adoption de l'agroécologie ... Catalogue en ligne
  17. Doss C., Meinzen-Dick R., Quisumbing A.  Theis S. (2018). Women in agriculture: Four myths. Global Food Security, 16:69–74.
  18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2017.10.001
  19. Francis H. M., Stevenson R. J., Chambers J. R., Gupta D., Newey B.  Lim C. K. (2019). A brief diet intervention can reduce symptoms of depression in young adults–A randomised controlled trial. PLoS ONE, 14(10) : 721-799.
  20. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222768
  21. Hosmer D. W., Lemeshow S.  Sturdivant R. X. (2013). Applied Logistic Regression. Wiley, New Jersey528 pages.
  22. Hosmer, D.W., Lemeshow, S. et Sturdivant, R.X. (2013) Régression logistique appliquée. 3e édition, Wiley. - Références - Publication de recherche scientifique
  23. Kassie M., Tekalign L.  Solomon S. (2015). Agricultural technology adoption and impact on household food security: a synthesis of evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa. Food Security, 7 :589-601.
  24. https://ideas.repec.org/s/ags/iaae15.html
  25. Kouadio K., Kouamé N. J.,  N'Guessan A. (2017). Etude de la productivité rizicole dans les systèmes irrigués de la Côte d'Ivoire. Agronomie Africaine, 29(3) : 215-227.
  26. Kpadenou C C., Tama C., Dado T. B.  Yabi J. A. (2019). Déterminants socio-économiques de l’adoption des pratiques agro écologiques en production maraîchère dans la vallée du Niger au Bénin. Int. J. Biol. Chem. Sci., 13 (7): 3103-3118.
  27. https://doi.org/10.4314/ijbcs.v10i2.27
  28. Lemeilleur S.  Sermage J. (2020). Building a knowledge commons: Evidence from the participatory guarantee system for an agroecological label in Morocco. International Journal of the commons, 14(1): 465-480.
  29. https://agritrop.cirad.fr/596679/1/Lemeilleur%20et%20Sermage%202020%20IJC.pdf
  30. Maré T. F., Zahonogo P.  Savadogo K. (2023). L’éducation des agriculteurs et l’adoption d’une agriculture durable et sans pesticides chimiques: données probantes du Burkina Faso rural, Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies, 15(2) : 404-425.
  31. https://doi.org/10.1108/JADEE-04-2023-0077
  32. Marenya P.  Barrett C. B. (2007). Household-level analysis of the adoption of improved maize varieties in Central Kenya. Food Policy, 32, 515-536.
  33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2006.10.002
  34. Moore G. C.  Benbasat I. (1991). Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation, Information Systems Research, Volume 2, pp. 192-222.
  35. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers%3Freferenceid%3D1691926&ved=2ahUKEwjijpGF7PSOAxVvWkEAHXg8H58QFnoECAkQAQ&usg=AOvVaw2VrYtcL_s1tUT9GDowNXUx
  36. Ngome E., Jager T.  Waal J. (2011). Adoption of conservation agriculture in Western Kenya. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 15 (6) : 3676-3683.
  37. Nikiema P. M. E. (2022). Evaluation de méthodes d’échantillonnage spatialisées avec l’outil AquaCrop pour l’estimation des rendements du blé d’hiver en Belgique : Cas de la Région limoneuse. Mémoire de master, Liège Université Sciences, 74 pages.
  38. http://hdl.handle.net/2268.2/15867
  39. Ouédraogo S., Benmarhnia T., Bonnet E., Somé P. A., Barro A. S., Kafando Y.  Koné B. (2018). Evaluation of effectiveness of a community-based intervention for control of dengue virus vector, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 24(10), 1859-1867. http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid2410.180069
  40. Oula P. Q., Martin T., Fondio L., Koné D., Djézou W. B.  Parrot L. (2021). Les déterminants de l’usage inadapté des produits phytophamarceutiques en maraichage de contre saison en Côte d’Ivoire. In : 14ème Journées de recherches en sciences scociales. INRAE, SFER, CIRAD. Clermond-Ferrand, France.: SFER, 1-15.
  41. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://agritrop.cirad.fr/599645/&ved=2ahUKEwjY3e-R59-PAxXhXUEAHVsdDT4QFnoECCcQAQ&usg=AOvVaw3Jcdn_vVxUkFnBo5tLIwYy
  42. Pretty J.  Bharucha, Z. P. (2015). Integrated pest management for sustainable intensification of agriculture in Asia and Africa. Insects, 6(1) :152-182. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/insects6010152
  43. Pretty J., Noble A. D., Bossio D., Dixon J., Hine R. E., Penning de Vries F. W  Morison J. (2006). Resource-conserving agriculture increases yields in developing countries. Environmental Science & Technology, 40(4):1114-1119. DOI: 10.1021/es051670d
  44. Prosperi P., Leclère M., Leadley P., Smith P.  Salles J. M. (2020). Factors influencing the adoption of sustainable farming practices: a review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 40 (4) : 32.
  45. Rogers E. (1995). Diffusion of innovation, Free Press, New York, 4th edition, 447p.
  46. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://teddykw2.files.wordpress.com/2012/07/everett-m-rogers-diffusion-of innovations.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwijneL07vSOAxVtQkEAHRPYOdIQFnoECAkQAQ&usg=AOvVaw3NYB0CAj1BlGacLxjbfccf
  47. Rogers E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations (5th ed.). Free Press, New York, 576 pages. Rogers, M.E. (2003) Diffusion des innovations. 5e édition, Free Pass, New York. - Références - Publication de recherche scientifique
  48. Rosset P. M.  Martínez T. M. E. (2012). Rural social movements and agroecology: context, theory, and process. Ecology and Society, 17(3), 17-32.
  49. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-05000-170317
  50. Sinyangwe S., Mkandawire R., Mwamakamba S.  Madzivhandila T. P. (2023). Opportunities and Challenges for the Promotion of Transitions to Agroecological Practices for Sustainable Food Production in Sub-Sahara Africa. Review paper, 29 p.
  51. http://dx.doi.org/10.20944/preprints202305.0009.v1
  52. Soro G. C. L. (2024). Insertion professionnelle des jeunes en milieu rural : enjeux et perspectives (cas de la région du Poro au Nord de la Côte D'ivoire). Mémoire de Master, MIFAR, 50 pages. SORO_MIFAR_2025.pdf
  53. Sultan B., Lalou R., Kergoat L., Gastineau B.  Vischel T. (2021). Changements climatiques et agriculture : impacts et adaptation en afrique de l'ouest. In : Cohen M. et Giusti C. (Eds) : Milieux extrêmes et critiques face au changement climatique : climats, territoires, environnement. Sorbonne Université Presses, Paris. pp 139-154.
  54. Changements climatiques et agriculture : impacts et adaptation en Afrique de l'Ouest
  55. Tapsoba P. K., Augustin K. N., Aoudji L., Kaboré M., Kestemont M., Legay C.  Enoch G. A. (2020). Contexte sociotechnique et transition agroécologique pour les petites exploitations agricoles au Bénin et au Burkina Faso. Agronomy, 10 (9) :1447.
  56. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://agris.fao.org/search/en/providers/122535/records/65de56370f3e94b9e5cdb754&ved=2ahUKEwit6IKQ7t-PAxW1VEEAHW63KjIQFnoECBwQAQ&usg=AOvVaw3o-zXVxu7W2YWec6JHiLKF
  57. Trabelsi M. (2017). Comment mesurer la performance agro écologique d’une exploitation agricole pour l’accompagner dans son processus de transition ? Thèse pour obtenir le grade de docteur, 373 pages. Comment mesurer la performance agroécologique d'une exploitation agricole pour l'accompagner dans son processus de transition? | Theses.fr
  58. Tlili W. (2015). L'emploi de la main d'œuvre féminine salariale agricole et son effet sur la production agricole et sur la vie de la femme rurale dans la région de Sidi Bouzid. Mémoire Master, CIHEAM Montpellier, 64 p
  59. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://www.iamm.ciheam.org/ress_doc/opac_css/index.php%3Flvl%3Dnotice_display%26id%3D36173&ved=2ahUKEwj7ud7J9N-PAxXDQkEAHfhnC4UQFnoECBoQAQ&usg=AOvVaw0FZtg14pi9bW0q80rKkJMq
  60. Traore A. J. F. (2022). Analyse socioéconomique de la chaine de valeur des cultures maraichères dans la zone de Korhogo. Mémoire Master Professionnel, Institut de Gestion Agropastorale (IGA), Université Peleforo GON COULIBALY (Korhogo, Côte d’Ivoire), Korhogo, 69 p. https://agritrop.cirad.fr/604171/1/Traoré%20-%202022%20-%20Analyse%20socioéconomique%20de%20la%20chaîne%20de%20valeur%20des%20cultures%20maraîchères%20dans%20la%20zone%20de%20Korhogo.pdf
  61. UN Women (2021). Progress on the Sustainable Development Goals: The gender snapshot, 35p. Progress-on-the-Sustainable-Development-Goals-The-gender-snapshot-2021-fr.pdf
  62. Verhofstadt B.  Maertens M. (2014). Can agricultural cooperatives improve food security? Evidence from Senegal. Food Policy, 44 :102-111
  63. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/164803/&ved=2ahUKEwjt6_KQ9t-PAxWIQEEAHdueFWgQFnoECCwQAQ&usg=AOvVaw0ou_Y1D7nzchhCZxP3Cp1o
  64. Vodounou, G. (2025). L'Agroécologie au cœur du développement durable en Afrique Subsaharienne.
  65. Site : L’Agroécologie au cœur du développement durable en Afrique Subsaharienne
  66. Wezel A., Herren B. G., Bezner Kerr R., Barrios E., Gonçalves A. L. R.  Sinclair F. (2020). Agroecological principles and elements and their implications for transitioning to sustainable food systems. Agronomy for Sustainable Development.
  67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-020-00646-z
  68. Wibowo D., Rahman A.  Saleh B. (2017). The role of government subsidies in promoting sustainable agriculture: A case study of organic farming in Indonesia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 149 :844-852