Abstract

Based on the performance of program indicators against the 2023 RKPD targets and the final targets of the Semarang City RPJMD (2021-2026) in the field of agriculture, challenges in agricultural activities are evident, such as a lack of supporting agricultural infrastructure, limited marketing of production, low institutional quality of farmers (6.7%), and the increasing narrowing of agricultural land due to the increase in built-up land. Facing the final challenge of converting agricultural land to non-agricultural use, through the Semarang City Regulation on Amendments to Regulation Number 14 of 2011 concerning the Spatial Plan (2011-2031), the Sustainable Food Agriculture Zone (KP2B) with an area of 2,602 hectares, consisting of Sustainable Food Agricultural Land (LP2B) with an area of approximately 1,633 hectares and Sustainable Food Agricultural Reserve Land (LCP2B) with an area of approximately 969 hectares spread across 7 districts in Semarang City. The research problem-solving approach was carried out by analyzing the suitability of KP2B and LCP2B land, both KP2B and LCP2B land in spatial aspects in the form of agricultural land suitability for KP2B designation as stipulated by the 2021 Semarang City RDTR and geophysical land suitability based on land units with reference to the Technical Guidelines for Land Suitability Assessment for Strategic Agricultural Commodities for food agricultural commodities. Research data collection was carried out using a grid system with 5 points which were then composited for laboratory testing. In addition, direct measurements of soil pH and temperature were also carried out. The results of laboratory tests and field parameter measurements showed that the suitability level of Teger land was classified as fairly suitable for corn cultivation, where there were inhibiting factors such as low total N content (>0.2% for S1), critical P₂O₅ that did not meet the requirements for corn cultivation (0.81–1.19 ppm), and low C -Organic content (0.81–1.19%). Furthermore, the suitability level of Salakan agricultural land is quite suitable for rice cultivation, with critical limiting factors in the form of very low C-Organic (0.087–0.17%) and low to very low available K (1.31–8.69 ppm).

Keywords

  • Women's Economic Empowerment
  • Income-Generating Activities
  • Livelihood Programs

References

  1. Astuti, D. Y. N. and K. D. (2019). Food crops agricultural land development plan in Semarang Regency Food crops agricultural land development plan in Semarang Regency. IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 1438 (2025) 012035. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1438/1/012035
  2. Azadi, H., Taheri, F., Burkart, S., Mahmoudi, H., De Maeyer, P., & Witlox, F. (2021). Impact of agricultural land conversion on climate change. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23(3), 3187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00712-2
  3. Baohua, F. (2022). Functions of Nitrogen , Phosphorus and Potassium in Energy Status and Their Influences on Rice Growth and Development ScienceDirect Functions of Nitrogen , Phosphorus and Potassium in Energy Status and Their Influences on Rice Growth and Development. August 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsci.2022.01.005
  4. Bashir, O., Ali, T., Baba, Z. A., Rather, G. H., Bangroo, S. A., Mukhtar, S. D., Naik, N., Mohiuddin, R., Bharati, V., & Bhat, R. A. (2021). Soil Organic Matter and Its Impact on Soil Properties and Nutrient Status BT - Microbiota and Biofertilizers, Vol 2: Ecofriendly Tools for Reclamation of Degraded Soil Environs (G. H. Dar, R. A. Bhat, M. A. Mehmood, & K. R. Hakeem (ed.); hal. 129–159). Springer InternationalPublishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61010-4_7
  5. Bilas, G., Karapetsas, N., Gobin, A., Mesdanitis, K., Toth, G., Hermann, T., Wang, Y., Luo, L., Koutsos, T. M., Moshou, D., & Alexandridis, T. K. (2022). Land Suitability Analysis as a Tool for Evaluating Soil-Improving Cropping Systems. In Land (Vol. 11, Nomor 12). https://doi.org/10.3390/land11122200
  6. Chen, C., Gu, N., & Jiang, Y. (2024). The key role of nitrogen fertilizer in crop rotation: Impact factors and efficiency improvement. Advances in Resources Research, 4(4), 754–769. https://doi.org/10.50908/arr.4.4_754
  7. Fahad, S., Ali, A., Urooge, S., Hanan, F., & Naushad, M. (2024). Reasons of Agriculture Land Conversion into Non-Agriculture Activities : A Case of Rural Area of District Peshawar. Journal of Asian Development Studies, 13(2), 1410–1421.
  8. Fang, X., Ghazali, S., Azadi, H., & Skominas, R. (2024). Agricultural land conversion and ecosystem services loss : a meta ‑ analysis. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26(9), 23215–23243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03597-z
  9. Handayani, W., Nugroho, P., & Hapsari, D. O. (2018). Kajian Potensi Pengembangan Pertanian Perkotaan di Kota Semarang. Jurnal Riptek, 12(2), 55–68.
  10. Hartmann, M., & Six, J. (2023). Soil structure and microbiome functions in agroecosystems. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 4(1), 4–18. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-022-00366-w
  11. Kariada, N., Martuti, T., Nugraha, S. B., Budi, W. A., Sidiq, N., Melati, I. S., & Herlina, L. (2024). Strategic mapping of food assets to enhance food security and foster Circular Economy in Semarang City : A sustainable perspective. Visions for Sustainability, 22, 331–358.
  12. Li, Y., Zheng, J., Wu, Q., Lin, W., Gong, X., Chen, Y., Chen, T., Siddique, K. H. M., & Chi, D. (2021). Zeolite alleviates potassium deficiency and improves lodging-related stem morphological characteristics and grain yield in rice. Crop & Pasture Science , 72(6), 407–415. https://doi.org/10.1071/CP21017
  13. Mehata, D. K., Kattel, I., Sapkota, P., Ghimire, N. P., & Mehta, R. K. (2023). Biofertilizers : A Sustainable Strategy for Organic Farming That Would Increase Crop Production and Soil Health Plant Physiology and Soil Chemistry ( PPSC ) BIOFERTILIZERS : A SUSTAINABLE STRATEGY FOR ORGANIC FARMING THAT. May. https://doi.org/10.26480/ppsc.02.2023.49.5
  14. Mubarok, R., Widyasamratri, H., & Budi, S. P. (2022). Analisis Perubahan Lahan Studi Kasus : Kecamatan Mijen Kota Semarang, Kota Malang, dan Bali. Jurnal Kajian Ruang, 2(2), 204. https://doi.org/10.30659/jkr.v2i2.26533
  15. Navidi, M. N., Seyedmohammadi, J., & McDowell, R. W. (2022). A Proposed New Approach to Identify Limiting Factors in Assessing Land Suitability for Sustainable Land Management. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 53(19), 2558–2573. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2022.2072511
  16. Prabhakar, S. V. R. K. (2021). A succinct review and analysis of drivers and impacts of agricultural land transformations in Asia. Land Use Policy, 102, 105238. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105238
  17. Pradana, A. (2023). Transformasi Sistem Pangan Berkelanjutan di Kota Semarang. JURNAL RIPTEK, 17(1), 61–70.
  18. Semarang, P. K. (2021). Perubahan Atas Peraturan Daerah Nomor 14 Tahun 2011 Tentang Rencana Tata Ruang Wilayah Kota Semarang Tahun 2011-2031 (Nomor 6).
  19. Suriyagoda, L. B. D. (2022). Crop Science Rice production in nutrient-limited soils : Strategies for improving crop productivity and land sustainability. 50(3), 521–539.
  20. sutriani, Emilya Nurjani, & Sri Rum Giyarsih. (2022). The Effect of City Development on Temperature in The City of Semarang. Journal of Multidisciplinary Science, 1(2 SE-Articles), 102–110. https://doi.org/10.58330/prevenire.v1i2.29
  21. Swain, J., Panda, R. K., Nayak, R. K., Satapathy, M. R., Das, J., & Panigrahy, M. (2025). Synergistic role of potassium fertilizer and kinetin in mitigating iron toxicity and enhancing yield in lowland rice. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 37648. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-21573-7
  22. Widianarko, B., Hantoro, I., Putri, N. I., & Nugrahedi, P. Y. (2025). Transforming food systems in Semarang City, Indonesia: A short food supply chain model. 10(1). https://doi.org/doi:10.1515/opag-2025-0440
  23. Zhang, Y., Wang, Q., Hu, Y., Wang, W., & Mao, X. (2025). Analysis of the Evolution of Non-Agriculturization Arable Land Use Pattern and Its Driving Mechanisms. In Land (Vol. 14, Nomor 5). https://doi.org/10.3390/land14050968
  24. Zuliastuti, T. M., & Wibisono, B. H. (2022). Motivasi Kebertahanan Pelaku Kegiatan Pertanian di Perkotaan (Studi Kasus Kecamatan Gunungpati). Reka Ruang, 5(1), 45–53.