Abstract

Sri Lanka has experienced recurrent natural disasters in recent years, including floods, landslides, cyclones, and extreme weather events. During such crises, digital platforms such as Facebook, WhatsApp, YouTube, and online news portals have become primary sources of information for the public. While these platforms enable rapid dissemination of disaster-related information, they also facilitate the spread of misinformation, rumors, and unverified content, often resulting in public confusion, fear, and inappropriate responses. Media literacy, defined as the ability to access, analyze, evaluate, and create media content critically, plays a crucial role in shaping how individuals interpret and respond to information in high-risk situations. Despite its growing importance, limited empirical research has examined the influence of media literacy on public acceptance and dissemination of disaster-related information in the Sri Lankan context. This study seeks to address this gap by examining the role of media literacy in shaping public responses to disaster-related information disseminated through digital platforms during recent natural disasters in Sri Lanka. This study adopts a mixed-methods research design, integrating both quantitative and qualitative approaches to provide a comprehensive analysis of the research problem, with quantitative data analyzed using SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences). The study population comprises adult residents of Gampaha, Kegalle, and Kandy districts who were directly or indirectly affected by Tropical Cyclone Ditva. Data were collected through questionnaires, interviews, and case studies, and a structured questionnaire was administered to a randomly selected sample of 300 participants to obtain systematic and comparable quantitative data, while qualitative methods were used to capture in-depth insights into participants’ experiences and perceptions.

Keywords

  • Media literacy
  • Disaster-Related Information
  • digital platforms
  • Cyclone Ditwah
  • Sri Lanka

References

  1. Austin, L., Liu, B. F., & Jin, Y. (2012). How audiences seek out crisis information: Exploring the social-mediated crisis communication model. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 40(2), 188–207.
  2. Department of Census and Statistics Sri Lanka. (2023). Household information and communication technology survey. Colombo: DCS.
  3. Guess, A. M., et al. (2020). A digital media literacy intervention increases discernment between mainstream and false news. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(27), 15536–15545.
  4. Guess, A. M., Lerner, M., Lyons, B., Montgomery, J. M., Nyhan, B., Reifler, J., & Sircar, N. (2020). A digital media literacy intervention increases discernment between mainstream and false news in the United States and India. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(27), 15536–15545.
  5. Hilberts, S., et al. (2025). The impact of misinformation on social media in the context of disasters (article in PubMed Central).
  6. Hobbs, R. (2010). Digital and media literacy: A plan of action. ERIC.
  7. Houston, J. B., Hawthorne, J., Perreault, M. F., Park, E. H., Goldstein Hode, M., Halliwell, M. R., Turner McGowen, S. E., & Griffith, S. A. (2015). Social media and disasters: A functional framework for social media use in disaster planning, response, and research. Disasters, 39(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12092
  8. Houston, J. B., et al. (2015). Social media and disasters: A functional framework. Disasters, 39(1), 1–22.
  9. Imran, M., Castillo, C., Diaz, F., & Vieweg, S. (2014). Processing social media messages in mass emergency: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys, 47(4), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1145/2771588
  10. Reuters. (2025, November 28). Cyclone Ditwah kills 46 in Sri Lanka, leaves 23 missing; rescue efforts continue.
  11. Pennycook, G., McPhetres, J., Zhang, Y., Lu, J. G., & Rand, D. G. (2021). Shifting attention to accuracy can reduce misinformation online. Nature, 592, 590–595.
  12. Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2022). Nudging social media toward accuracy. (Open-access version via PubMed Central).
  13. Potter, W. J. (2013). Review of literature on media literacy. Sociology Compass
  14. Sadri, A. M., Hasan, S., Ukkusuri, S. V., & Cebrian, M. (2017). Understanding information spreading in social media during Hurricane Sandy: User activity and network properties.
  15. Suraweera, N. (2025). The impact of media school clubs on students’ media literacy skills, specifically for Sri Lanka. American Journal of Multidisciplinary Research & Development, 7(12), 1–7.
  16. Tandoc, E. C., Lim, Z. W., & Ling, R. (2018). Defining fake news. Digital Journalism.
  17. Tandoc, E. C., Lim, Z. W., & Ling, R. (2018). Defining “fake news”: A typology of scholarly definitions. Digital Journalism, 6(2), 137–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1360143
  18. UNESCO. (2013). Global media and information literacy assessment framework. UNESCO.
  19. Vicari, R., & D’Arcy, C. (2025). A toolbox to deal with misinformation in disaster risk management. AI & Society.
  20. Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359(6380), 1146–1151. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap9559
  21. Wardle, C., & Derakhshan, H. (2017). Information disorder: Toward an interdisciplinary framework for research and policy making. Council of Europe.