Abstract

This study explores the implementation and perception of scientific management practices at the School of Foreign Languages (SFL), Thai Nguyen University, within the broader context of Vietnamese higher education reform. Using a qualitative case study approach, data were collected through interviews, observations, and document analysis involving faculty members, department heads, and administrators. Thematic analysis revealed five core areas of reform: strategic planning, standardization, performance measurement, faculty perceptions, and implementation challenges. Findings show that while scientific management has improved operational efficiency and accountability, it also raises concerns related to academic autonomy, workload, and inconsistent application. The study contributes to understanding how management reforms intersect with institutional culture and offers context-sensitive recommendations for governance in higher education.

Keywords

  • Colonialism
  • Culture
  • East
  • Imperialism
  • Orientalism
  • West

References

  1. Altbach, P. G. (2015). What counts for academic productivity in research universities? International Higher Education, (81), 6–7.
  2. Ball, S. J. (2012). Performativity, commodification and commitment: An I-spy guide to the neoliberal university. British Journal of Educational Studies, 60(1), 17–28.
  3. Bleiklie, I. (2014). Comparing university organizations across boundaries. Higher Education, 67(4), 381–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-013-9684-0
  4. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
  5. Brennan, J., & Shah, T. (2000). Managing quality in higher education: An international perspective on institutional assessment and change. Open University Press.
  6. Cheng, Y. C. (2009). Development of research on school effectiveness and school improvement in East Asia. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 20(4), 397–408.
  7. Clarke, C. A., & Knights, D. (2015). Careering through academia: Securing identities or engaging ethical subjectivities? Human Relations, 68(12), 1865–1888.
  8. Deem, R. (2001). Globalisation, New Managerialism, Academic Capitalism and Entrepreneurialism in Universities: Is the Local Dimension Still Important? Comparative Education, 37(1), 7–20.
  9. Do, Q. H., & Pho, T. H. (2017). Understanding challenges in Vietnamese higher education reforms: A case study at a regional university. VNU Journal of Science: Education Research, 33(2), 33–45.
  10. Fazekas, M., & Burns, T. (2022). Governing education through digital platforms: A comparative study of five OECD education systems. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 265.
  11. Ferlie, E., Musselin, C., & Andresani, G. (2008). The steering of higher education systems: A public management perspective. Higher Education, 56(3), 325–348.
  12. Harman, G., Hayden, M., & Nghi, P. T. (Eds.). (2010). Reforming higher education in Vietnam: Challenges and priorities. Springer.
  13. Hazelkorn, E., & Gibson, A. (2019). Global rankings and the geopolitics of higher education. Routledge.
  14. Hood, C. (1995). The “new public management” in the 1980s: Variations on a theme. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 20(2–3), 93–109.
  15. Huang, F. (2017). University governance in East Asia: Transformation under globalisation. Higher Education Quarterly, 71(2), 154–169.
  16. London, J. D. (2011). Globalization and the governance of education in Vietnam. In J. Zajda (Ed.), Globalisation and education reforms (pp. 97–110). Springer.
  17. Marginson, S. (2016). The Dream is Over: The Crisis of Clark Kerr's California Idea of Higher Education. University of California Press.
  18. Ministry of Education and Training (MOET). (2020). Circular on Enhancing University Autonomy and Accountability in Vietnam.
  19. Nguyen, T. (2021). Managing university autonomy in Vietnam: Between policy and practice. Asian Education and Development Studies, 10(2), 158–172.
  20. Nguyen, T. M., & Ta, N. H. (2023). Scientific Management in Vietnamese Higher Education: Challenges and Prospects. Journal of Educational Management, 12(2), 45–63.
  21. Nguyen, T. M., & Tran, T. T. (2020). The role of university leadership in reforming teaching and learning: Lessons from Vietnam. Asian Education and Development Studies, 9(2), 299–312.
  22. Pham, T. H. (2022). Higher education reform in Vietnam: Moving towards autonomy and accountability. International Journal of Educational Development, 92, 102593.
  23. Rohde, S. (2019). Reassessing Taylor: The relevance of scientific management in the digital age. Journal of Management History, 25(3), 278–295.
  24. Shattock, M. (2010). Managing successful universities. McGraw-Hill Education.
  25. Taylor, F. W. (1911). The Principles of Scientific Management. Harper & Brothers.
  26. World Bank. (2021). Universities and knowledge economies in ASEAN: Reshaping policies for competitiveness. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1645-1
  27. Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.